Book III: The Moral Ideal and Moral Progress.
Chapter I: Good and Moral Good.
§166.
But with what plausibility can the motive described as a sense of
dignity be reckoned a desire for pleasure at all? Mill
indeed calls it an essential part of the happiness of those in whom it is
strong
; but no desire as such, since it must rather be painful than
pleasant, can properly be called a part of happiness.
It may be suggested
therefore that by the sense of dignity
spoken of Mill understands an
emotion, as distinct from desire, which he would no doubt be justified in
calling a part of happiness, an ingredient in the sum of a man’s
pleasures. In that case we must suppose that it is desire for the pleasure of
this emotion which makes the man, who is capable of the pleasure attending the
exercise of the higher faculties, prefer this to the pleasure which he might
share with the dunce. If this indeed were the true account of the matter, the
strict Benthamite who will recognise no distinction in quality as distinct from
quantity of pleasure, might say that it was simply a case of the pleasure
preferred being more productive.
The intellectual pleasure brings the
additional pleasure, consisting in the emotion called sense of dignity, which
the animal pleasure does not. It is scarcely however a plausible account of the
motive which makes an intelligent person unwilling to be a fool, a person of
feeling and conscience unwilling to be selfish or base, though persuaded that
the change would save him much discontent, to say that it is desire for the
preponderating pleasure involved in the sense of being a superior person. Nor,
if it were, would there be any ground for holding the man so actuated to be
really happier than the fool or the selfish man, who, according to his standard
of measurement, has as good a chance of feeling the pleasure of superiority
without corresponding discontent. The truth is that Mill does not really regard
this sense of dignity
as an emotion in distinction from desire. He
regards it as a counter motive to desires for animal pleasure, which mere
emotion could not be. Nor does he mean that the preference determined by it is
preference for the pleasure of feeling superior to the pleasures shared with
average men. The motive which he has in view is a desire to be worthy, not a
desire to feel the pleasure of being worth more than others; and he only regards
it as desire for pleasure at all, because he fancies that a desire, of which the
disappointment makes me unhappy, is therefore a desire for
happiness—that a desire is for the pleasure which ensues upon its
satisfaction. (§166 ¶1)