Chapter IV: Metaphysical Ethics.
§ 74.
That such a
reduction of all propositions to the type of those which assert either
that something exists or that something which exists has a certain attribute
(which means, that both exist in a certain relation to one another), is
erroneous, may easily be seen by reference to the particular class of ethical
propositions. For whatever we may have proved to exist, and whatever two
existents we may have proved to be necessarily connected with one another, it
still remains a distinct and different question whether what thus exists is
good; whether either or both of the two existents is so; and whether it is good
that they should exist together. To assert the one is plainly and obviously
not the same thing as to assert the other. We understand what we mean
by asking: Is this, which exists, or necessarily exists, after all, good? and we
perceive that we are asking a question which has not been answered. In
the face of this direct perception that the two questions are distinct, no proof
that they must be identical can have the slightest value. That the proposition This is good
is thus distinct from
every other proposition was proved in Chapter I; and I may now illustrate
this fact by pointing out how it is distinguished from two particular
propositions with which it has commonly been identified. That so and so
ought to be done is commonly called a moral law; and this
phrase naturally suggests that the proposition is in some way analogous either
to a natural law, or to a law in the legal sense, or to both. All three are, in
fact, really analogous in one respect, and in one respect only: that they
include a proposition which is universal. A moral law asserts This
is good in all cases
; a natural law asserts This happens in
all cases
; and a law, in the legal sense, It is commanded that this
be done, or left undone, in all cases.
But since it is very natural
to suppose that the analogy extends further, and that the assertion This is
good in all cases
is equivalent to the assertion This happens in all
cases
or to the assertion It is commanded htat this be done in all
cases,
it may be useful briefly to point out that they are not
equivalent. (§ 74 ¶ 1)